The Supreme Court is expected to strike down affirmative action in university admissions. It could impact corporate diversity programs

A group of college students laugh as they walk through campus.
The Supreme Court is expected to make a decision about affirmative action in college admissions in June.
Ariel Skelley—Getty Images

The conservative-majority Supreme Court is expected to strike down or severely restrict race-based college admissions programs in June. With it comes a ripple effect in corporate America, potentially upending diversity programs, which my colleague Trey Williams and I explore in Fortune’upcoming June/July issue.

If the justices forbid educational institutions from using race as a factor in admissions decisions, it could “augur where the court might go with respect to certain programs for private employers,” says Kevin Cloutier, a partner at the Sheppard Mullin law firm’s labor, employment, and business trial practice group. Courts could rule affirmative action programs unconstitutional for federal contractors or be more receptive to reverse discrimination claims against private companies. 

As a result, universities would almost certainly become less diverse over time, leaving companies with a more racially homogenous talent pool to recruit from and making it harder for them to make good on racial diversity commitments.

The decision could also encourage attacks on corporate diversity programs, as already evidenced by the conservative group America First Legal’s complaint, which requested a civil rights investigation with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission into whether the BlackRock Founders Scholarship, an internship for minority students, discriminates against those from majority backgrounds.

DEI professionals who spoke to Fortune don’t believe it’s overblown to view the looming Supreme Court decision as a time bomb. “What we’re seeing is in a lot of ways a backlash to us being able to have made so much progress,” says Ericka Brownlee-Keller, DEI head at a renewable energy company. “We often talk about ‘When’s the other shoe gonna drop?’ A lot of this is people’s fears being realized.”

As companies brace for the SCOTUS decision, DEI professionals are devising actions for employers to consider, including: 

– Reviewing diversity programs to ensure the company has a robust and evidenced-based case for such initiatives.

– Vetting public statements related to diversity initiatives.

– Creating new pathways for diverse recruitment, such as doubling down on partnerships with historically Black colleges and universities and sponsorship and mentorship programs.

– Asking what small and under-resourced DEI teams need to handle what may come in the ruling’s wake.

“That’s a lot. So this is the time to help your DEI team,” says Evelyn Carter, a social psychologist and president of the diversity and inclusion consulting firm Paradigm. “Ask your team what they need, and then deliver on it.”

Read the full article here.

Paige McGlauflin
paige.mcglauflin@fortune.com
@paidion

Reporter's Notebook

The most compelling data, quotes, and insights from the field.

Inflation leads to rising wages, not the other way around, according to a Federal Reserve study showing that increased worker pay isn't the cause of inflation. 

“The recent run-up in the employment cost index, a measure of wages favored among economists and policymakers, 'explains only about 0.1 percentage point' of the three percentage-point increase in consumer price inflation excluding food and energy.” —Bloomberg

Around the Table

A round-up of the most important HR headlines, studies, podcasts, and long-reads.

- Gig work was supposed to offer flexible hours and higher pay for low-wage workers. But it hasn't quite lived up to its promise. New York Times

- American cities are bustling again, just not close to office buildings where people work. Wall Street Journal

- Countries that welcome new residents will be better poised to build workforces of the future. The Economist

- Critics of monitoring software for remote workers say they're often used to exert power over employees rather than encourage productivity. The Guardian

- Gallup chairman Jim Clifton says CEOs and CHROs are “doing a terrible job with the new will of workers” by forcing them back to the office. Semafor

Watercooler

Everything you need to know from Fortune.

EEOO campus recruiting. About two-thirds of Americans say colleges should consider race in college admissions. —AP

Amazon caregiver leave. Amazon unveiled a new contract for working parents offering them additional unpaid leave during school holidays. Critics say the reduced hours would give workers less than a livable wage. —Chloe Taylor

Root of all excess. Former Slack CEO Stewart Butterfield attributed the hiring bloat at tech companies to managers who want the prestige of overseeing multiple employees. —Steve Mollman

College cashout. Operations research is the highest-paying field for college graduates, with only 104,000 open roles. —Alicia Adamczyk 

Lowering expectations. Gen Z hesitates to take on blue-collar jobs in the U.S. and China despite struggling to find corporate work. —Chloe Berger

This is the web version of CHRO Daily, a newsletter focusing on helping HR executives navigate the needs of the workplace. Today’s edition was curated by Paolo Confino. Sign up to get it delivered free to your inbox.